Smooth Manifolds Proving (1, 0) Is A Regular Value For Smoothness

by ADMIN 66 views

Hey everyone! Today, we're diving into the fascinating world of smooth manifolds. We'll tackle a classic problem: proving that a certain topological space is indeed a smooth manifold. To do this, we'll be focusing on showing that the point (1,0)(1, 0) is a regular value for a specific map. This is a crucial step in demonstrating the smoothness of our manifold. So, buckle up, and let's get started!

Setting the Stage: The Map F and Mn

Before we jump into the proof, let's define the key players. We're working with a map FF that takes pairs of vectors from Rn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1} and maps them to R2\mathbb{R}^{2}. Specifically, FF is defined as follows:

F:Rn+1Γ—Rn+1β†’R2,F(p,q)=(∣∣p∣∣2,⟨p,q⟩)F: \mathbb{R}^{n+1} \times \mathbb{R}^{n+1} \to \mathbb{R}^{2}, \quad F(p, q) = (||p||^{2}, \langle p, q \rangle).

Here, ∣∣p∣∣2||p||^{2} represents the squared Euclidean norm of the vector pp, and ⟨p,q⟩\langle p, q \rangle denotes the standard inner product (dot product) of the vectors pp and qq.

Now, let's introduce our manifold candidate, MnM_n. This is defined as the preimage of the point (1,0)(1, 0) under the map FF:

Mn:=Fβˆ’1((1,0))={(p,q)∈Rn+1Γ—Rn+1∣F(p,q)=(1,0)}M_{n} := F^{-1}((1, 0)) = \{(p, q) \in \mathbb{R}^{n+1} \times \mathbb{R}^{n+1} \mid F(p, q) = (1, 0) \}.

In simpler terms, MnM_n consists of all pairs of vectors (p,q)(p, q) in Rn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1} such that the squared norm of pp is equal to 1 (i.e., pp lies on the unit sphere) and the dot product of pp and qq is equal to 0 (i.e., pp and qq are orthogonal).

Understanding the Significance: Guys, why are we doing this? Well, showing that MnM_n is a smooth manifold is a fundamental problem in differential geometry. Smooth manifolds are the bedrock upon which much of advanced geometry and topology is built. They are spaces that locally "look like" Euclidean space, allowing us to apply the tools of calculus and analysis. Think of them as generalizations of surfaces in 3D space, but in higher dimensions!

Proving that MnM_n is a smooth manifold involves demonstrating that it satisfies certain technical conditions. One of the most common approaches is to use the regular value theorem. This theorem states that if a map between smooth manifolds has a regular value, then the preimage of that value is itself a smooth manifold. That's where our goal of showing (1,0)(1, 0) is a regular value comes in! This single assertion will allow us to show that MnM_n is a smooth manifold.

The Game Plan: Differentiability and Regular Values

Our strategy is clear: We need to show two things:

  1. F is differentiable: This means that the map FF has a well-defined derivative at every point in its domain.
  2. (1, 0) is a regular value of F: This means that the derivative of FF is surjective (i.e., its image spans the entire target space R2\mathbb{R}^{2}) at every point in the preimage Fβˆ’1((1,0))=MnF^{-1}((1, 0)) = M_n.

If we can establish these two facts, the regular value theorem will guarantee that MnM_n is a smooth manifold. Let's dive into the details of each step.

Step 1: Proving Differentiability

The differentiability of FF isn't too tricky to show. Remember that F(p,q)=(∣∣p∣∣2,⟨p,q⟩)F(p, q) = (||p||^{2}, \langle p, q \rangle). Both components of FF are built from basic operations (squaring, dot product) that we know are differentiable.

Let's express ∣∣p∣∣2||p||^{2} and ⟨p,q⟩\langle p, q \rangle in terms of the components of pp and qq. Suppose p=(p1,p2,...,pn+1)p = (p_1, p_2, ..., p_{n+1}) and q=(q1,q2,...,qn+1)q = (q_1, q_2, ..., q_{n+1}). Then:

∣∣p∣∣2=p12+p22+...+pn+12||p||^{2} = p_1^{2} + p_2^{2} + ... + p_{n+1}^{2}

⟨p,q⟩=p1q1+p2q2+...+pn+1qn+1\langle p, q \rangle = p_1 q_1 + p_2 q_2 + ... + p_{n+1} q_{n+1}

These expressions are polynomials in the components of pp and qq. Polynomials are smooth functions, meaning they have derivatives of all orders. Therefore, both ∣∣p∣∣2||p||^{2} and ⟨p,q⟩\langle p, q \rangle are differentiable, and consequently, the map FF is differentiable. Awesome!

The Derivative of F: To proceed further, we'll need to compute the derivative of FF. The derivative of a map between Euclidean spaces is a linear transformation, which can be represented by a matrix called the Jacobian matrix. Let's find the Jacobian matrix of FF.

Let (p,q)∈Rn+1Γ—Rn+1(p, q) \in \mathbb{R}^{n+1} \times \mathbb{R}^{n+1}. The derivative of FF at (p,q)(p, q), denoted by dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)}, is a linear map from Rn+1Γ—Rn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1} \times \mathbb{R}^{n+1} to R2\mathbb{R}^{2}. We can represent it as a 2Γ—2(n+1)2 \times 2(n+1) matrix. To find this matrix, we need to compute the partial derivatives of the components of FF with respect to the components of pp and qq.

Let's start with the partial derivatives of ∣∣p∣∣2||p||^{2}:

βˆ‚βˆ‚pi∣∣p∣∣2=βˆ‚βˆ‚pi(p12+p22+...+pn+12)=2pi\frac{\partial}{\partial p_i} ||p||^{2} = \frac{\partial}{\partial p_i} (p_1^{2} + p_2^{2} + ... + p_{n+1}^{2}) = 2p_i

Now, let's compute the partial derivatives of ⟨p,q⟩\langle p, q \rangle with respect to the components of pp and qq:

βˆ‚βˆ‚pi⟨p,q⟩=βˆ‚βˆ‚pi(p1q1+p2q2+...+pn+1qn+1)=qi\frac{\partial}{\partial p_i} \langle p, q \rangle = \frac{\partial}{\partial p_i} (p_1 q_1 + p_2 q_2 + ... + p_{n+1} q_{n+1}) = q_i

βˆ‚βˆ‚qi⟨p,q⟩=βˆ‚βˆ‚qi(p1q1+p2q2+...+pn+1qn+1)=pi\frac{\partial}{\partial q_i} \langle p, q \rangle = \frac{\partial}{\partial q_i} (p_1 q_1 + p_2 q_2 + ... + p_{n+1} q_{n+1}) = p_i

Putting it all together, the Jacobian matrix of FF at (p,q)(p, q) is:

dF(p,q)=[2p12p2...2pn+100...0q1q2...qn+1p1p2...pn+1]dF_{(p, q)} = \begin{bmatrix} 2p_1 & 2p_2 & ... & 2p_{n+1} & 0 & 0 & ... & 0 \\ q_1 & q_2 & ... & q_{n+1} & p_1 & p_2 & ... & p_{n+1} \end{bmatrix}

This matrix represents the linear transformation dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)}. To show that (1,0)(1, 0) is a regular value, we need to prove that this matrix has rank 2 (i.e., its rows are linearly independent) for all (p,q)∈Mn(p, q) \in M_n.

Step 2: Proving (1, 0) is a Regular Value

This is the heart of the proof! We need to show that dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)} has rank 2 for all (p,q)∈Mn(p, q) \in M_n. Recall that (p,q)∈Mn(p, q) \in M_n means that ∣∣p∣∣2=1||p||^{2} = 1 and ⟨p,q⟩=0\langle p, q \rangle = 0.

The rank of a matrix is the number of linearly independent rows (or columns). For a 2Γ—m2 \times m matrix, having rank 2 simply means that the two rows are not scalar multiples of each other. So, we need to show that the rows of dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)} are linearly independent whenever (p,q)∈Mn(p, q) \in M_n.

Let's look at the rows of dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)}:

Row 1: (2p1,2p2,...,2pn+1,0,0,...,0)(2p_1, 2p_2, ..., 2p_{n+1}, 0, 0, ..., 0)

Row 2: (q1,q2,...,qn+1,p1,p2,...,pn+1)(q_1, q_2, ..., q_{n+1}, p_1, p_2, ..., p_{n+1})

Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that these rows are linearly dependent. This means there exists a scalar cc such that:

(q1,q2,...,qn+1,p1,p2,...,pn+1)=c(2p1,2p2,...,2pn+1,0,0,...,0)(q_1, q_2, ..., q_{n+1}, p_1, p_2, ..., p_{n+1}) = c(2p_1, 2p_2, ..., 2p_{n+1}, 0, 0, ..., 0)

This gives us two sets of equations:

  1. qi=2cpiq_i = 2cp_i for all i=1,2,...,n+1i = 1, 2, ..., n+1
  2. pi=0p_i = 0 for all i=1,2,...,n+1i = 1, 2, ..., n+1

The second set of equations immediately tells us that p=(0,0,...,0)p = (0, 0, ..., 0). But this contradicts the fact that ∣∣p∣∣2=1||p||^{2} = 1 for (p,q)∈Mn(p, q) \in M_n. Therefore, our assumption that the rows are linearly dependent must be false!

An Alternative Approach: Another way to think about this is to consider the determinant of a 2Γ—22 \times 2 submatrix of dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)}. If we can find a 2Γ—22 \times 2 submatrix with a non-zero determinant, then the rows of dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)} are linearly independent.

Consider the submatrix formed by the first row and the (n+2)(n+2)-th column, and the second row and the (n+2)(n+2)-th column. This submatrix looks like this:

[2p10q1p1]\begin{bmatrix} 2p_1 & 0 \\ q_1 & p_1 \end{bmatrix}

The determinant of this submatrix is 2p122p_1^{2}. If p1β‰ 0p_1 \neq 0, then the determinant is non-zero, and we're done. If p1=0p_1 = 0, we can consider a similar submatrix using pip_i for some iβ‰ 1i \neq 1. Since ∣∣p∣∣2=1||p||^{2} = 1, at least one pip_i must be non-zero, so we can always find a submatrix with a non-zero determinant. Nice!

Conclusion of Step 2: We've successfully shown that the rows of dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)} are linearly independent for all (p,q)∈Mn(p, q) \in M_n. This means that the derivative dF(p,q)dF_{(p, q)} has rank 2, and therefore, it is surjective. Consequently, (1,0)(1, 0) is a regular value of FF.

The Grand Finale: Mn is a Smooth Manifold!

We've done it, guys! We've proven that FF is differentiable and that (1,0)(1, 0) is a regular value of FF. Now, we can invoke the powerful regular value theorem. This theorem tells us that the preimage of a regular value under a smooth map is a smooth manifold. In our case, this means that:

Mn=Fβˆ’1((1,0))M_{n} = F^{-1}((1, 0)) is a smooth manifold.

What does this mean in practice? This result is huge! It tells us that MnM_n, the set of pairs of orthogonal vectors (p,q)(p, q) in Rn+1\mathbb{R}^{n+1} with ∣∣p∣∣=1||p|| = 1, has a smooth structure. We can do calculus on MnM_n, define tangent spaces, and explore its geometric properties. This opens the door to a whole world of interesting mathematics!

Further Exploration: This result is just the beginning. We can further investigate the properties of MnM_n. For example, we can determine its dimension. Since FF maps to R2\mathbb{R}^{2}, and we're taking the preimage of a point, the dimension of MnM_n is given by:

dim(Mn)=dim(Rn+1Γ—Rn+1)βˆ’dim(R2)=2(n+1)βˆ’2=2n\text{dim}(M_n) = \text{dim}(\mathbb{R}^{n+1} \times \mathbb{R}^{n+1}) - \text{dim}(\mathbb{R}^{2}) = 2(n+1) - 2 = 2n

So, MnM_n is a smooth manifold of dimension 2n2n. We can also explore its topological properties, such as its connectedness and compactness.

Final Thoughts

Proving that a space is a smooth manifold can seem daunting at first, but by breaking it down into smaller steps and using powerful tools like the regular value theorem, we can conquer these challenges. Guys, this whole journey has been an excellent demonstration of how differential geometry connects concepts like differentiability, regular values, and the structure of manifolds. Keep exploring, keep questioning, and keep pushing the boundaries of your mathematical understanding! You've got this!